
Civilization Revolution Single-Player PS3 Review
Only the single-player game was reviewed. The idea of playing Civilization with a complete stranger simply didn’t appeal to me enough to try multiplayer.
I’ve been playing the Civilization series on the PC since the very beginning, so I will freely admit that I do have bias towards the more detailed PC Civilization games.
Liked:
1. It’s Civ. Still has that classic Civilization “one more turn” addictiveness.
2. Different ways to win. You can win by killing every other Civ, or win through other peaceful methods. Gives you a reason to play the game in different ways.
3. Researching techs, building units, wonders and buildings, and running an empire is lots of fun.
4. Less micro-management than previous PC Civilizations.
5. Best turn-based strategy game currently available for consoles. Wish they’d make more of those.
Disliked:
1. The “Simlish” type gibberish the animated characters are always spouting. English or shut the fuck up.
2. I can’t find a difficulty level that suits me the best. Chieftain and Warlord tend to be too easy, but I can play the game any way I feel like. On King I can win using certain strategies that feel almost “gimmicky”. (but I don’t think I could EVER win o Domination victory on King or higher) I haven’t tried anything higher than King since I’m not winning too often on that difficulty level.
3. Every game I’ve played, no matter what difficulty I played on, I’ve ended up at war with EVERY SINGLE other Civ at the same time. Whether I wanted to or not. The Ai would only attack my Civ 99% of the time. I’ve only seen the Ai capture another Ai’s city TWICE in MANY games… Seems like the Ai is programmed to target the player.
4. Several minor nitpicks… This may be a perception thing, but it seems like the Ai can churn out an extraordinary amount of units in a short time. More noticeable at the “King” difficulty level. I couldn’t seem to replicate the apparent speed of the Ai production.
How is it I was able to get “Advanced Flight” tech before researching “Flight” first? That would have been like the Wright Brothers building a B-2 Stealth bomber before their “Wright Flyer” flew…
They dumbed down some of the management things, but made combat harder. Before I realized that creating armies was the name of the game for combat, I was getting frustrated by not being able to capture cities.
No hot-seat games. So you can’t have a friendly game with your girlfriend/wife/buddy on the same console.
Game of the Week is disappointing.
No trophy support.
5. Diplomacy has been neutered. It all comes down to peace, war, trade, or bribe. No alliances or open borders, or any of the more advanced things found on the PC games. So that means no co-op play either.
Yay: Finally a Civ game worth playing on a console! +1
Gay: Absolutely NO customizable game types. You can’t even choose the size of the map or how many civs you want to play against. GAAAAY! -1
Final BS Rating for Players Who Are Used to Civ on the PC : 0 MEH
Estimated Final BS Rating For Console Users Who Have Never Played Civ: +2 PRETTY GOOD

Closing Statement:
Fans of Civ on the PC will find about an equal amount of things to like, and dislike with Civ Revolution. It’s definitely worth a try, but you’ll probably end up going back to Civ 4 after a few plays. It is a bit dumbed-down, but not always in necessarily a bad way. Seems to be designed with online multiplayer console play in mind.
Console players who haven’t yet tried out Civilization will most likely find a great strategy game if they don’t mind the turn-based gameplay.
More good news today, Uncharted: Drake’s Fortune now has trophy support! Gives me a reason to finally play through this game again. I haven’t touched it since beating it right after it came out last year.
I hope a lot more PS3 games get trophy support.
Leave a Comment
Posted in Video Game Commentary | Tags: drake's fortune, naughty dog, playstation 3, ps3, sony, support, trophy, uncharted